AFT
CONTRACT ALERT: PLEASE GIVE US YOUR
FEEDBACK!
We are at a crucial juncture in
negotiations. After almost a full
academic year of bargaining for salary, benefits and part-time office hours, we
have narrowed the gap between what the District is
offering and a fair settlement for faculty.
The District has insisted on a four-year settlement. Although the AFT has concerns about this, we
have worked hard and in good faith to find ways in which such an agreement
would be beneficial for faculty and guarantee a fair compensation
increase. Unfortunately, on Wednesday
the 26th, the District negotiators refused to discuss our last
counterproposal with the Chancellor and the Board of Trustees and abruptly made
the call to go to mediation.
Below are the District’s current offer and the AFT’s counterproposal, which was developed with the help of
the AFT Executive Committee during a break in negotiations on April 26th:
Comparison of
“Total Compensation” Proposals
|
|
District
Proposal |
AFT
Counterproposal |
|
2005-06 |
4.23% (3.23% in salaries) |
4.23% (3.23% in salaries) |
|
2006-07 |
5.8% (4.68% in salaries) |
6.0% (4.88% in salaries) |
|
2007-08 |
4.0% (2.88% in salaries) |
5.0% (3.88% in salaries) |
|
2008-09 |
4.0% (2.88% in salaries) |
5.0% (3.88% in salaries) |
|
Total |
18.03% |
20.23% |
In addition, the AFT proposed re-opening up to
three articles for negotiation in each of the 2007-08 and 2008-09 years.
Although the District’s proposal amounts to an
18.03% increase over four years, it is a “total compensation” proposal, which
means that the costs for maintaining current benefits and paying for part time
office hours are included in the 18.03%. Broken down by allocation, the 18.03%
over four years looks like this:
1.88%
Maintaining
current benefits over four years (0.38% in the first year and 0.50% in years 2, 3 & 4)
2.47% Beginning
to fund part-time office hours over four years (0.62% per year)
13.67% Increase in faculty salaries
-----------
18.03% Total compensation package
Salary increases below COLA
The faculty salary increase (the money we take
home to pay for housing, food, utilities) of 13.67% averages to 3.42% per
year for the four-year contract period. This figure is well below COLA
for 2005-06 (COLA = 4.23%) and 2006-07 (COLA = 5.8%), and no one knows at this
point what COLA will be for the subsequent two years of the District’s proposed
four-year contract settlement (although predictions and trends seem to indicate
that they will be above 3.5%).
The AFT Executive Committee’s based its
counterproposal on the following concerns:
·
A four-year
settlement will lock us in and make it impossible (or difficult) to negotiate
any section of the contract from 2006 through 2009.
·
The District
is offering less than COLA in salary increases.
·
Considering
the risk of inflation and uncertain economic conditions in the future, the
District’s offer is not good enough to warrant closing the contract for the
next three years.
·
The AFT
counterproposal provides extra security in the fourth year in case the cost of
living continues to rise.
The AFT negotiating team and our Executive
Committee are concerned that salary increases that are below COLA—especially at
a time when so many of us are doing large amounts of uncompensated work outside
of the classroom in areas such as Accreditation, Program Review, SLOs, and so on—will not keep our salaries competitive nor
keep up with the increasing prices of gas and utilities, for example.
The Positives
On the positive side, our efforts at the table
have moved the District in many areas. We have made significant progress from
the 0% initially proposed by the District. In addition, after many years of
refusing to do so, the District has finally agreed to negotiate the issue of part-time
office hours (which will be phased in
over the four years of the agreement with the goal being to pay part-timers at
the special rate for one office hour for every three hours of teaching). The
District also has agreed to increase the medical cap in each year of the
contract agreement to ensure that faculty on the two-party or family Kaiser plans will continue to pay only $40 out of pocket per month.
Given the District’s position, it seems as if we
are heading to mediation in order to get a settlement for faculty that is
better than the District’s last offer. What do you think? This is your
contract! We want to hear from you. Please reply to this e-mail and let us know
your views on this subject.
In Unity,
Joaquin Rivera,
Co-President and AFT Chief Negotiator
Katharine Harer, Co-President and
negotiating team member
Vicky Clinton, Cañada
Part-timer Rep and negotiating team member
Pease either
respond to the sender, AFT Chief Negotiator Joaquin Rivera, or to the
Co-Chapter Chairs on your campus. For faculty at CSM, send your response to
Teeka James (james@smccd.net)
or Yaping Li (liy@smccd.net);
for faculty at Skyline College, send your response to Chip Chandler (chandler@smccd.net)
or Rick Hough (hough@smccd.net);
for faculty at Cañada College, send your response to Karen
Olesen (olesen@smccd.net)
or Monica Malamud (malamudm@smccd.net).